← RA-153.1-2 · Open App_IA_Citoyenne (French application)

App_IA_Citoyenne ↔ RA-153.1-2

Candidate alignment profile v0.1 — October 4, 2026.

Status. This document does not certify App_IA_Citoyenne as compliant with RA-153.1-2. The application remains autonomous. The profile sets out a possible mapping of its workflow onto the v1.6 architecture to make alignment testable rather than implicit.

Principle

The application seeks to preserve citizen authority when an AI analyzes, reformulates or prepares a text that may be published or become binding. RA-153.1-2 provides a passage structure: intent → understanding → capabilities → strategy → authority → publication/execution → evidence.

SAY ↓ SEE ↓ TEST ↓ AUTHORIZE ↓ PUBLISHED VERSION ↕ alignment profile R0 → R1 → R2/R3 → R4 → R5 → R6

Proposed Mapping

App Stage	RA Object	Integrity Requirement	Status
SAY [DITES]	R0 RequestEnvelope	Preserve the original wording, author, provenance and authority sources. Contextual text does not acquire the author's authority.	Candidate
SEE [VOYEZ]	R1 NeedDescriptor	Make interpretation, assumptions, ambiguities and differences visible. A reformulation is not silently promoted to intent.	Candidate
TEST [ÉPROUVEZ]	R2 + R3	Define the required capabilities (analysis, comparison, reformulation) and propose strategies without granting them authority.	Candidate
AUTHORIZE [AUTORISEZ]	R4 + Human Gate	The citizen sees the binding version, its transformations and the relevant consequences; only the citizen can authorize, refuse, defer or request revision.	Central
PUBLISHED VERSION [VERSION PUBLIÉE]	R5 + R6	The published version must be linked to the authorized version; any difference after authorization must trigger renewed validation. Evidence distinguishes the declared version from the version actually published.	To Be Tested

Profile-Specific Rules

No silent semantic widening: a reformulation may clarify the form but cannot add scope, an obligation, causality, a parameter or a decision without explicitly returning to the author.
Author Human Gate: when a transformation becomes binding, authority returns to the human author.
Version binding : the authorized version receives a digest; publication must reference the same content or request renewed authorization.
Contestability: the user must be able to see what changed, refuse, go back and request different wording.
Minimum evidence: retain the original wording, relevant transformations, the authorized version and the version actually published.

What This Profile Does Not Address

It prescribes neither a voting platform, electoral identity, ballot cryptography nor a complete institutional architecture. It addresses only the passage between human intent, its AI-assisted transformation and a version the human may choose to publish.

Next Step

The profile will become a candidate for compliance only after independent application testing, publication of test vectors and verification of the relevant v1.6 invariants: authority provenance, narrowing, Human Gate, version binding and evidence binding.